Is Vaping Health Risky?
The writer examines the possible social and health benefits of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She refers to e-cigarettes as electric cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the various possibilities for teens in light of the fact that smoking has turned into a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that we should consider the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also considering the dangers of nicotine addiction. The writer also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I trust her that e-cigarette vaporizers certainly are a harmless option to smoking, if used correctly.
Almost all of the data on smoking and its risks comes from adults, and this helps it be hard to assess the way the risks are reduced vapinger.com by e-smoking. It is estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths every year are because of smoking. This figure is probable an underestimation, since many deaths may be the result of second hand smoke. It also assumes that people who smoke don’t intend to achieve this.
The author suggests that we should think about the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the effect of tobacco products, while providing a much less harmful experience. The problem with this particular approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, though it isn’t. Many people don’t realize how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking is to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that folks who utilize the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that comes from that is that because e smokers don’t feel any of the physical effects of smoking, they can not be deemed to be causing these deaths, when they are.
However, it’s important to remember that smoking cigarettes and using vaporizers are both virtually identical behaviors. What makes vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to achieve the same effect as smoking, without the associated risks. Vaporizing offers a highly similar experience as smoking cigarettes. This means that vapers could be increasing their chances of quitting the habit. It also means that they’re taking steps in direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the chance of enjoying a healthier lifestyle.
The author makes some valid points concerning the dangers of smoking. He also makes some valid criticisms of the lack of nicotine, and of the dangers of carbon monoxide smoke. However, his real issue is one of regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies must not be allowed to advertise their products as safe when all they will have done is increase the amount of chemicals and additives which are present in traditional cigarettes. The issue with this argument is that we have already seen the unwanted effects of increased levels of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We curently have countless reports concerning the negative unwanted effects of nicotine, especially in smokers attempting to quit. We already have a lot of stories about the rise of cancers and respiratory problems due to long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been a significant factor in the spike in smoking-related deaths in the last couple of years.
The writer does not may actually recognize the irony of arguing against smoking by way of a healthier alternative, but doesn’t appear to consider the potential negative health ramifications of his product either. He also discounts the idea that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually turn back to cigarette smoking. He appears to think that all we need to do to beat cigarettes is to reduce the amount of nicotine we take in. The fact is that smokers who try to quit often do so due to other health issues, and aren’t just turning to the cigarettes to get away from their bad habits. There are plenty of reasons why people smoke. The author has basically ignored all of them in his arguments against vaping.
Although it holds true that the cigarettes do not contain any real tobacco, a number of the chemicals found in using tobacco are found in the smokes. The writer seems to be of the belief that all we must do to solve the problem of smoking is to decrease the amount of chemicals we ingest through our lungs. The argument he presents is merely not located in sound scientific fact. There is no real proof that reducing the number of chemicals we take in improves anything other than our health. The author also discounts the theory that the cigarettes are less dangerous than regular cigarettes because they don’t contain the harmful chemicals found in regular cigarettes.